• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
DB-I Logo

DenseBreast-info, Inc.

Get Smart About Being Dense

HOME/USA

EUROPE

Español

  • Home
  • For Patients
    • Patients Home
    • Dense Breasts: 5 Facts You Should Know
    • Is My Mammogram Enough?
    • Screening Tests After a Mammogram (Table)
    • Let’s Talk About Dense Breasts, Video Series
    • Patient Questions and Answers
    • Patient Resources by Language
    • Print: Patient Fact Sheet
    • Print: Patient Brochure
  • For Providers
    • Providers Home
    • CME/CE: “Dense Breasts, Risk, and Supplemental Screening”
    • Flow Chart: Who Needs More Screening?
    • Health Care Provider FAQs
    • Risk Model Tutorial
    • Table: Mammography Guideline Comparison
    • Table: Dense Breast Screening Guidelines
    • Table: High/Increased-Risk Screening Guidelines
    • DBI Research
    • Patient Resources
  • Screening Technologies
    • Screening Technologies Home
    • For Patients: Screening Tests After a Mammogram (Table)
    • For Providers: Cancer Detection by Screening Method (Table)
    • 2D/3D Mammography
    • Mammography AI Screening Tools, Comparative Tables
    • Breast Ultrasound (Sonogram)
    • Breast MRI
    • Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)
    • Molecular Breast Imaging
    • DBI Research
  • Inform/Insurance Laws
    • Inform/Insurance Laws Home
    • Inform: Federal FDA Dense Breast Reporting
    • Insurance
      • State Law Insurance Map and Federal HRSA Guidelines
      • State Law Insurance Table
      • Federal Insurance Bill: Find It Early Act
  • Blog & Press
  • About Us
    • About Us Home
    • Our Mission
    • World Dense Breast Day
    • Our Team
    • DBI Research
    • Let’s Talk About Dense Breasts, Video Series
    • Patient Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Please Donate
  • Our Corporate and Health Group Supporters
/ Blog / U.S. State Insurance Updates, UK BRAID trial + ABUS Results in Korea
U.S. State Insurance Updates, UK BRAID trial + ABUS Results in Korea | Dense Breast Info

U.S. State Insurance Updates, UK BRAID trial + ABUS Results in Korea

January 11, 2026 by JoAnn Pushkin

U.S. State Insurance Bills

New 2026 insurance bill introductions for expanded breast imaging include: Indiana HB1112 and Kentucky HB135

BRAID RSNA Presentations and Automated US Study

Additional BRAID Trial Results

Several sessions at RSNA 2025 showed second round results from the UK BRAID trial led by Dr. Fiona Gilbert.  The initial trial enrolled 9361 women age 50-70 from October 2019-March 2024 with dense breasts and a negative mammogram who were randomized to receive supplemental screening with automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), abbreviated MRI (AB-MRI), or contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), with results published in The Lancet in May 2025.  Women with a negative result from the initial supplemental screen who enrolled by 3/31/23 were invited to have a second round of screening 18 months later that included mammography (MG).

  • Cancer detection rates in the second round of screening were similar for each of ABUS, AB-MRI, and CEM arms at about 8/1000.1
  • Recall rates decreased for both AB-MRI and CEM in the second round but were similar to the first round for ABUS.2

1 Cancer detection rates were 15/1572 (9.5/1000) for ABUS+MG; 9/1051 (8.6/1000) for AB-MRI+MG; and 6/870 (7.0/1000) for CEM in the second round. [By comparison, cancer detection rates in the first round were 4.2/1000 for ABUS; 17.4/1000 for AB-MRI; and 19.2/1000 for CEM after a negative mammogram.]

2 Recall rates in the second round were 4.3% for ABUS; 3.5% for AB-MRI; and 4.7% for CEM.  In the first round, recall rates were 4.0% for ABUS; 9.7% for AB-MRI; and 9.7% for CEM.

 

ABUS in Non-dense Breasts

Two referral centers in Korea retrospectively reviewed results of screening women with non-dense breasts and compared performance of digital mammography (DM) alone vs DM + automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). They reviewed 2904 paired screening examinations among 1683 women with non-dense breasts.

  • Adding ABUS to DM slightly increased cancer detection in women with scattered fibroglandular density, but not in women with fatty breasts.1
  • The small increase in cancer detection was accompanied by a small increase in false positive recalls.2
  • Women diagnosed with breast cancer were older (63 ± 9 years vs. 59 ± 10 years, P = 0.04) and tended to have risk factors (19.2% vs. 4.2%, P < 0.001) compared to those without breast cancer.
1 Cancer detection rates were 9.0/1000 for DM+ABUS and 7.9/1000 for DM alone (P<.001), with 3/26 (11%) cancers seen only on ABUS, all invasive T1, node-negative tumors; the added yield of 1.1/1000 was all in the 1569 women with scattered fibroglandular density [cancer detection rate 8.5/1000 for DM+ABUS and 7.4/1000 for DM alone (P<.001)].  Six cancers were visible only on DM, including 2 invasive cancers and 4 DCIS.
2 False-positive recall rate increased from 61/2878 (2.1%) for DM alone to 143/2878 (5.0%) for DM+ABUS (P<.001).

DenseBreast‑info, Inc. is an independent, nonprofit organization. DBI is not affiliated with or endorsed by other organizations unless expressly identified. If you have questions about DBI’s programs or partnerships, please contact us.

© Unpublished, DenseBreast-info, Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | 501(c)(3) Public Charity

  • Online Privacy Policy
  • Online Terms of Use & Disclaimers

This website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for medical advice from a physician or to create a standard of care for health care providers. In addition, information has been provided by independent third parties and may not represent the views of DenseBreast-info.org. Please check with a physician regarding your specific condition, if you have any questions, or need a diagnosis. If you are experiencing an urgent medical condition, call your local emergency services [e.g., 9-1-1 (in the USA) or 1-1-2 (in Europe)].